*** Quits: daryn_ (~daryn@h184.104.88.75.dynamic.ip.windstream.net) (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) | 00:41 | |
*** Joins: daryn_ (~daryn@h184.104.88.75.dynamic.ip.windstream.net) | 00:51 | |
*** Quits: daryn_ (~daryn@h184.104.88.75.dynamic.ip.windstream.net) (Ping timeout: 265 seconds) | 01:02 | |
*** Joins: daryn_ (~daryn@h184.104.88.75.dynamic.ip.windstream.net) | 01:04 | |
*** Joins: davidinc (~davidinc@213.55.100.134) | 01:23 | |
*** Quits: daryn_ (~daryn@h184.104.88.75.dynamic.ip.windstream.net) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) | 01:25 | |
*** Joins: daryn (~daryn@h184.104.88.75.dynamic.ip.windstream.net) | 01:39 | |
*** Quits: giallu (~giallu@fedora/giallu) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) | 01:56 | |
*** Quits: daryn (~daryn@h184.104.88.75.dynamic.ip.windstream.net) (Quit: Ex-Chat) | 01:57 | |
*** Joins: Cupertino (~Cupez@unaffiliated/cupertino) | 02:27 | |
*** Joins: Github (~Github@sh1-ext.rs.github.com) | 02:30 | |
Github | mantisbt: master Daryn Warriner * 49bb5df (1 files in 1 dirs): Fix Bug #12441 - Unable to update custom fields due to missing function error. - http://bit.ly/9V33Zd | 02:30 |
---|---|---|
*** Parts: Github (~Github@sh1-ext.rs.github.com) | 02:30 | |
*** Quits: siebrand (~beis@sm.xs4all.nl) () | 02:34 | |
*** Joins: Rixie (~Rixie@0x4dd7390e.adsl.cybercity.dk) | 02:44 | |
*** Quits: Rixie (~Rixie@0x4dd7390e.adsl.cybercity.dk) (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) | 03:05 | |
*** Joins: Rixie (~Rixie@0x4dd7390e.adsl.cybercity.dk) | 03:24 | |
davidinc | Ldap authentication works. Some how I were interested to authenticate groups????? | 03:30 |
davidinc | Is there anyway to do that? | 03:32 |
*** Joins: djSupport (~djsupport@188-221-240-190.zone12.bethere.co.uk) | 04:42 | |
*** Quits: djSupport (~djsupport@188-221-240-190.zone12.bethere.co.uk) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) | 05:25 | |
*** Joins: mndrt (~oberlaen@delorean.fzi.de) | 05:52 | |
mndrt | hi there, what's the easiest way to change a project inside Mantis so that existing bugs can be updated, but no new bugs can be reported? | 05:52 |
dhx1 | mndrt: set the bug report threshold high while keeping the bug update threshold constant? | 07:07 |
dhx1 | see config_defaults_inc.php for a full list of thresholds you have available to you | 07:07 |
mndrt | hmm, sounds interesting. I was hoping I could do this from within the web interface. But as long as I can configure the thresholds individually for different projects, that should work. | 07:09 |
mndrt | we have to migrate our bug database onto another server and merge the bugs with the ones already existing on the other server. For the most part it'll be a manual process, I fear. but for this reason I want to gradually "freeze" the bugs on the old server , to ease migration. | 07:10 |
*** Quits: dhx1 (~anonymous@c122-107-170-247.eburwd5.vic.optusnet.com.au) (Remote host closed the connection) | 07:11 | |
*** Joins: kirillka (~Miranda@195.242.142.17) | 07:23 | |
nuclear_eclipse | micahg: just getting it into -proposed should be enough -- I'll grab it when I get to work and test it to verify | 07:27 |
davidinc | Is it possible to use LDAP authenticate by group | 08:13 |
davidinc | for example $g_ldap_group_dn = 'groupName=itunit,ou=Group,ou=directory,ou=gtz-et,ou=com'; | 08:14 |
nuclear_eclipse | davidinc: I don't know, but I doubt it | 08:15 |
nuclear_eclipse | the ldap integration always struck me as very minimalist | 08:15 |
davidinc | some how I found small informations on this ticket http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=9124 | 08:17 |
*** Joins: giallu (~giallu@fedora/giallu) | 08:17 | |
davidinc | I don't think the patch is clean. | 08:18 |
*** Joins: dhx1 (~anonymous@c122-107-170-247.eburwd5.vic.optusnet.com.au) | 08:25 | |
*** Joins: daryn (~daryn@h158.249.190.173.static.ip.windstream.net) | 09:06 | |
*** Quits: kirillka (~Miranda@195.242.142.17) (Quit: kirillka) | 09:56 | |
*** Quits: Rixie (~Rixie@0x4dd7390e.adsl.cybercity.dk) (Quit: Rixie) | 10:01 | |
*** Joins: Rixie (~Rixie@0x4dd7390e.adsl.cybercity.dk) | 10:03 | |
*** Quits: Rixie (~Rixie@0x4dd7390e.adsl.cybercity.dk) (Client Quit) | 10:03 | |
*** Quits: mndrt (~oberlaen@delorean.fzi.de) (Remote host closed the connection) | 10:21 | |
*** Quits: davidinc (~davidinc@213.55.100.134) (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) | 10:32 | |
*** Joins: alexsander (~alexsande@201.47.212.206.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br) | 10:34 | |
*** Quits: Cupertino (~Cupez@unaffiliated/cupertino) (Quit: I give up...) | 11:07 | |
*** Joins: alexsander_ (~alexsande@189.27.226.158.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br) | 11:58 | |
*** Quits: alexsander (~alexsande@201.47.212.206.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) | 11:59 | |
*** Quits: micahg (~micah@ubuntu/member/micahg) (Ping timeout: 250 seconds) | 13:12 | |
*** Joins: djSupport (~djsupport@188-221-240-190.zone12.bethere.co.uk) | 13:35 | |
*** Joins: micahg (~micah@ubuntu/member/micahg) | 13:50 | |
*** Joins: paulr_ (~IceChat09@2001:470:9310:aaaa:ccc9:ce5d:ed91:7373) | 13:53 | |
nuclear_eclipse | micahg: how long should it take before I can find/download the package from -proposed? | 13:54 |
micahg | nuclear_eclipse: probably less than 24 hours, someone ususally processes the SRU queue every morning, it was uploaded about 2 hrs ago | 13:55 |
* micahg can't upload that yet | 13:55 | |
nuclear_eclipse | oh, ok, so when he says uploaded, he means its uploaded to a queue before actually being added to the archive servers? | 13:56 |
micahg | nuclear_eclipse: right, it goes into an unapproved queue which the SRU team reviews regularly to allow stuff that qualifies as an SRU | 13:56 |
nuclear_eclipse | gotcah | 13:57 |
nuclear_eclipse | thanks | 13:57 |
nuclear_eclipse | this is why I never got into being a package maintainer, way too much stuff to keep track of and handle outside of just building the package :P | 13:57 |
micahg | nuclear_eclipse: if you need an i386 build, I can push to my SRU PPA and you can get it in less than an hour | 13:57 |
nuclear_eclipse | ah, no, it's no big deal | 13:57 |
nuclear_eclipse | I can just keep the irssi package from lucid installad until everything works out | 13:58 |
nuclear_eclipse | ppas don't really work properly here due to our proxy setup anyways | 13:58 |
nuclear_eclipse | I actually run an apt-mirror locally because updates would flood our DSL line with all the machines trying to grab packages at the same time | 13:59 |
micahg | that's cool that you have so many machines that you need that | 14:00 |
nuclear_eclipse | it only mirrors normal, -updates and -security repos though, so people who have already updated to maverick will have to stay pinned until it hits -updates anyways | 14:00 |
paulr_ | hmm | 14:00 |
paulr_ | what you broken? :P | 14:01 |
micahg | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/silc-client/+bug/655311 | 14:01 |
paulr_ | ahh | 14:01 |
nuclear_eclipse | micahg: between desktops, laptops, and virtualized servers, we have a lot of ubuntu installs, including 8.04, 9.10, 10.04, and a few 10.10 installs for the early adopters like myself | 14:01 |
nuclear_eclipse | so I run a local mirror for all those versions, and when a new version hits, I actually created the initial mirror at home on an external drive, and then rsync it to the local mirror at work rather than killing our shitty connection here | 14:03 |
micahg | cool | 14:04 |
nuclear_eclipse | about 160GB of packages mirrored :P | 14:04 |
nuclear_eclipse | oh, and I also mirror the Google Chrome repos :P | 14:05 |
nuclear_eclipse | but the Chrome repos don't even account for 200MB of packages | 14:05 |
micahg | we have chromium in maverick | 14:05 |
micahg | and lucid | 14:05 |
nuclear_eclipse | yeah, Chromium isn't quite the same thing :P | 14:06 |
nuclear_eclipse | at least it wasn't last I checked | 14:06 |
micahg | well, it should be pretty close except for embedded flash | 14:06 |
nuclear_eclipse | last I checked Chromium doesn't support the sync features either | 14:06 |
micahg | oh, hmm, idk | 14:07 |
nuclear_eclipse | also, a lot of us run the beta/unstable Chrome versions, which get updates every few days that you wouldn't get from Chromium | 14:07 |
nuclear_eclipse | at least not from distro packages iirc | 14:07 |
micahg | we have those in a PPA | 14:08 |
nuclear_eclipse | eg, I run the Chrome 7.x unstable repo | 14:08 |
nuclear_eclipse | ah, yeah, like I said, PPAs don't work well for us | 14:08 |
micahg | https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/dev | 14:09 |
nuclear_eclipse | I don't understand why they act differently, but we can't seem to get the PPAs to auth/validate correctly, so they always complain of insecure packages | 14:09 |
micahg | nuclear_eclipse: oh, did you add the key? | 14:09 |
nuclear_eclipse | apt-add-repository fails to get it due to the proxy, but even adding it manually doesn't seem to fix the problem... | 14:10 |
micahg | each PPA is signed by a different key | 14:10 |
micahg | hmmm, that's weird | 14:10 |
nuclear_eclipse | yeah | 14:10 |
paulr_ | hmm | 14:10 |
paulr_ | how do i update to 10.10 | 14:10 |
nuclear_eclipse | I just don't feel like tracking down the problem =\ | 14:10 |
nuclear_eclipse | do-release-upgrade | 14:10 |
paulr_ | from a RC | 14:10 |
nuclear_eclipse | paulr_: do-release-upgrade | 14:10 |
micahg | nuclear_eclipse: you could try filing a request here for help: https://answers.launchpad.net/soyuz/ | 14:11 |
nuclear_eclipse | oh, just a normal package update will suffice | 14:11 |
nuclear_eclipse | paulr_: ubuntu treats an RC as the same thing as the final release | 14:11 |
nuclear_eclipse | so as long as you update your packages, it doesn't matter that you started from an RC | 14:11 |
paulr_ | dist-upgrade or safe-upgrade | 14:11 |
nuclear_eclipse | either | 14:11 |
paulr_ | i've never worked out difference | 14:12 |
nuclear_eclipse | but I prefer to use `aptitude full-upgrade` | 14:12 |
paulr_ | between the two | 14:12 |
paulr_ | full? | 14:12 |
nuclear_eclipse | safe-upgrade will refuse to update packages that require either adding/removing or changing other packages | 14:12 |
paulr_ | so I could do safe first | 14:13 |
paulr_ | then full | 14:13 |
nuclear_eclipse | dist-upgrade will update everything, and aptitude's full-upgrade will basically do a dist-upgrade but make sure it doesn't bork package dependency chains without asking you | 14:13 |
* paulr_ confused | 14:13 | |
nuclear_eclipse | you can just do a full-upgrade | 14:13 |
paulr_ | so full update does less then dist? | 14:13 |
nuclear_eclipse | usually it's identical | 14:13 |
paulr_ | full: 70 packages upgraded, 6 newly installed | 14:14 |
paulr_ | dist: 70 packages upgraded, 6 newly installed, | 14:14 |
nuclear_eclipse | but when you're running alpha/beta or alternate repos, full-upgrade will to you before upgrading complain if a package update will | 14:14 |
nuclear_eclipse | will break something | 14:14 |
micahg | paulr_: dist-upgrade was replaced with full-upgrade IIRC | 14:14 |
paulr_ | safe: 70 packages upgraded, 6 newly installed | 14:14 |
nuclear_eclipse | paulr_: most of the time, there really isn't a difference between the three methonds | 14:15 |
nuclear_eclipse | it's all in the semantics and details | 14:15 |
nuclear_eclipse | micahg: apt-get still uses safe-/dist-upgrade, aptitude switched to using safe-/full-upgrade | 14:17 |
micahg | nuclear_eclipse: ah, yes, that's the distinction, thanks | 14:18 |
giallu | oops, I think messed up and joined #ubuntu :P | 14:40 |
nuclear_eclipse | giallu: no, your first mistake was joining Fedora instead ;) | 14:41 |
* micahg hugs giallu | 14:41 | |
micahg | giallu: it's called taking advantage of distro maintainers in your channel ;) | 14:42 |
nuclear_eclipse | exactly | 14:43 |
giallu | no no,m it's called "off topic", and I hate you :) | 14:43 |
nuclear_eclipse | giallu: we hate you too ;) | 14:44 |
nuclear_eclipse | giallu: besides, you would know if you were in #ubuntu because we wouldn't actually be talking about anything useful, we'd just be fawning over the God of Ubuntu or asking dumb questions like how do I play games | 14:46 |
micahg | and there would be a few more people in here as well (currently 1710 people) | 14:47 |
nuclear_eclipse | lol, "few" | 14:48 |
nuclear_eclipse | oh, and don't forget the inability to actually follow any of the conversation because there are 300 people trying to talk over top of each other | 14:49 |
giallu | yeah, I also hate #fedora for the same reason | 14:49 |
nuclear_eclipse | arg, new kernel for 10.10 already, and I can't reboot because my workstation is hosting multiple in-use vms... | 14:50 |
*** Quits: alexsander_ (~alexsande@189.27.226.158.dynamic.adsl.gvt.net.br) (Quit: Saindo) | 16:38 | |
paulr_ | wonder if that fixes my kernel issues | 17:18 |
*** Quits: moto-moi (~hylke@cara.xs4all.nl) (Quit: Ex-Chat) | 17:25 | |
giallu | paulr_, guess not, it's probably for https://launchpad.net/bugs/cve/2010-2961 | 17:25 |
micahg | changelog here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/2.6.35-22.34 | 17:41 |
*** Joins: xenofiend (~xenofiend@adsl-065-013-224-006.sip.tys.bellsouth.net) | 17:45 | |
xenofiend | hello. I have a question about the source integration plugin. What's the best way to trigger the "import latest data" routine? I've seen the curl scripts but I don't see how that would work because the curl user isn't logged in to mantis. | 17:48 |
nuclear_eclipse | xenofiend: the point of the curl script is that you explicitly whitelist IP addresses that are allowed to update trigger the import without needing to be logged in | 17:54 |
xenofiend | is that whitelist something I do in mantis? | 17:55 |
nuclear_eclipse | the whitelist is found on the source integration config page | 17:55 |
nuclear_eclipse | yes | 17:55 |
xenofiend | ok that makes great sense. Thanks a lot for the plugin! | 17:56 |
nuclear_eclipse | your'e welcome :) | 17:56 |
*** Quits: daryn (~daryn@h158.249.190.173.static.ip.windstream.net) (Quit: Ex-Chat) | 18:03 | |
xenofiend | well, I've whitelisted my remote IP and checked the "Allow Remote Imports" checkbox and I still get the invalid security token. Should I use my fqdn instead of a numerical IP? | 18:23 |
nuclear_eclipse | xenofiend: if you're using the post-commit hook for svn, it's classified as a remote check-in rather than a remote import =\ | 18:24 |
xenofiend | I'm actually trying to use: curl http://mysite/mantisbt/plugin.php?page=Source/repo_import_latest&id=14 | 18:26 |
xenofiend | it should even work in a browser as long as it is on a whitelisted machine. | 18:27 |
xenofiend | I think. | 18:27 |
nuclear_eclipse | xenofiend: do you have anonymous access enabled? | 18:27 |
xenofiend | no | 18:27 |
nuclear_eclipse | that might be the problem... | 18:27 |
nuclear_eclipse | I've never tested it on a system without anonymous accesss | 18:28 |
nuclear_eclipse | xenofiend: my power is out, so I gotta disconnect for a bit, feel free to post a bug on my tracker at leetcode.net/mantis, or hit me up again tomorrow | 18:29 |
xenofiend | thanks for your help. | 18:29 |
nuclear_eclipse | np | 18:30 |
nuclear_eclipse | good luck :) | 18:30 |
*** Quits: paulr_ (~IceChat09@2001:470:9310:aaaa:ccc9:ce5d:ed91:7373) (Quit: Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm) | 19:08 | |
*** Quits: scribe9343423 (~scribe934@static.96.23.63.178.clients.your-server.de) (Remote host closed the connection) | 20:00 | |
*** Joins: scribe9343423 (~scribe934@static.96.23.63.178.clients.your-server.de) | 20:00 | |
*** Quits: micahg (~micah@ubuntu/member/micahg) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) | 20:26 | |
*** Joins: robbie_ (~rob@CPE-60-231-21-101.qld.bigpond.net.au) | 21:19 | |
robbie_ | heh, just found answer to my question (found edit button) , I knew going to irc would help :) | 21:20 |
robbie_ | tata | 21:20 |
*** Quits: robbie_ (~rob@CPE-60-231-21-101.qld.bigpond.net.au) (Client Quit) | 21:20 | |
*** Quits: dhx1 (~anonymous@c122-107-170-247.eburwd5.vic.optusnet.com.au) (Remote host closed the connection) | 21:24 | |
*** Joins: micahg (~micah@ubuntu/member/micahg) | 21:27 | |
*** Joins: dhx1 (~anonymous@c122-107-170-247.eburwd5.vic.optusnet.com.au) | 21:46 | |
*** Joins: daryn (~daryn@h140.214.31.71.dynamic.ip.windstream.net) | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.9.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!